Forums · Baby/Little Cup Metagame sub forum?

PkmnTrainerAbram

0 +0

Oct 9 '07

Awhile ago I said I'd set out to make an FAQ on this metagame that started in GSC and carried over to this gen with PBR.

Thing is, due to factors like lack of time and losing most of what I'd written before I saved it on GameFAQS, I lost interest.

However I feel it would be a great idea if we had a sub forum in the Metagame discussion forum for this metagame. Not only will it be something that hasn't been done mainstream(to my knowledge) on other main Pokemon sites therefore cutting down on plagiarism of other's analysis's, it's also a good way to let other's know that such a metagame DOES exist outside of Stadium 2/PBR.

That and it'll cut down on my work load...er, I mean it'll bring everyone together! Yeah.
dry.gif'
Rating: 0

AgentParanoia

0 +0

Oct 9 '07

We used to have an alternate metagame discussion forum, but Fantasy nixed it because no one posted in it (standard-lovin' bastards...). Anyway, if you want to start a discussion about a different metagame, do it in the competitive forum. Don't expect to see a large response, though.
Rating: 0

Wiik23

0 +0

Oct 9 '07

I am very interested in the Baby Metagame and I look forward to rape many teams with TR Trapinch.
Rating: 0

bobblyhead

0 +0

Oct 9 '07

AS MASTER OF BABY POKEMON, I WILL DESTROY YOU ALL.
Rating: 0

anonymous!cherubi

0 +0

Oct 10 '07

I imagine Farfetch'd would reach a top tier.
Rating: 0

Ongakujin

0 +0

Oct 10 '07

Pi-pi... pi-kachu?
Rating: 0

The Crazy Monkey

0 +0

Oct 10 '07

Huzzah for Scyther!
Rating: 0

Ominous Doom

0 +0

Oct 10 '07

Endravor + Ice Shard Phanpy would pwn you. Anyway, a new metagame is great.
Rating: 0

Sir Spanky

0 +0

Oct 10 '07

QUOTE (Anonymous @ Oct 10 2007, 02:10 AM)
I imagine Farfetch'd would reach a top tier.

Pokemon that do not evolve are banned.
Rating: 0

Ongakujin

0 +0

Oct 10 '07

OMG MUDKIPZ
Rating: 0

Dantmotckc

0 +0

Oct 11 '07

i made a baby team, actually:

Abra
Scyther
Cranidos
Cyndaquill
Bronzor
Eevee, but probably replacing

have you seen Abra's base stats? its ridiculous!
Rating: 0

The Crazy Monkey

0 +0

Oct 11 '07

I've seen his base stats. They surprised me for a baby.
Rating: 0

Sir Spanky

0 +0

Oct 11 '07

Btw Scyther (he is far too good) and the 'doubling' items (see clamperl or cubone) are also normally banned. Pokemon that were fully evolved in previous generations are also banned, so obviously no Sneasel rape.

The best pogeys are stuff like Diglett, Abra, Gastly, Cranidos, Elekid, Bronzor, Taillow, Duskull, Porygon, Azurill, Specsbagon, Trapinch etc

EDIT: Pikachu is evolved ?_?
Rating: 0

PkmnTrainerAbram

0 +0

Oct 11 '07

So if no one makes a separate forum for it, should people wishing to submit analysises use a certain tag for topic titles, that way all of them can be compiled into an Index on that same forum to avoid confusion?

I'll submit something this week when I get time.

And yeah, Abra owns that metagame.
Rating: 0

Shadow Light Master

0 +0

Oct 12 '07

Have any of you even read my Scyther analysis? He's extremely good, even in BL. He'd totally decimate the Baby Cup. If you haven't read it, go ahead.

BTW, Pokemon that don't evolve or Pokemon that didn't evolve last gen are banned. They're too powerful.

And Abram, although I loved your Baby Cup idea back on GFAQs, there won't be a Sub-Forum because Fantasty merged all alternate metagame discussion forums back a while ago. I'd suggest that if you make an analysis for an unevolved Pokemon, in the analysis just say it's for the Baby Cup.
Rating: 0

Sir Spanky

0 +0

Oct 12 '07

Way to read my post a few posts SLM :s
Rating: 0

demigodxyz

0 +0

Oct 13 '07

QUOTE (Shadow Light Master @ Oct 11 2007, 08:49 PM)
Have any of you even read my Scyther analysis? He's extremely good, even in BL. He'd totally decimate the Baby Cup. If you haven't read it, go ahead.

BTW, Pokemon that don't evolve or Pokemon that didn't evolve last gen are banned. They're too powerful.

And Abram, although I loved your Baby Cup idea back on GFAQs, there won't be a Sub-Forum because Fantasty merged all alternate metagame discussion forums back a while ago. I'd suggest that if you make an analysis for an unevolved Pokemon, in the analysis just say it's for the Baby Cup.

That's everything Spanky wrote. I hate to say it, but READ BEFORE YOU POST!
Rating: 0

AgentParanoia

0 +0

Oct 13 '07

QUOTE (Sir Spanky @ Oct 10 2007, 04:23 PM)
QUOTE (Anonymous @ Oct 10 2007, 02:10 AM)
I imagine Farfetch'd would reach a top tier.

Pokemon that do not evolve are banned.

Maybe pokemon like Heracross, Skarmory, Miltank, and Tauros, but Farfetch'd? Gastly, I think, could do better if not as well as it, in terms of tier placement. And it's not like Farfetch'd is really gamebreaking to begin with.

Or perhaps I'm understanding this wrong...
Rating: 0

Sir Spanky

0 +0

Oct 14 '07

You aren't, but Farfetch'd is probably the only Pokemon (apart from Ditto and Unown) that this applies to, so we generally just ignore them.
Rating: 0

AgentParanoia

0 +0

Oct 15 '07

QUOTE (Sir Spanky @ Oct 14 2007, 05:54 PM)
You aren't, but Farfetch'd is probably the only Pokemon (apart from Ditto and Unown) that this applies to, so we generally just ignore them.

Delibird? Corsola maybe? I dunno.
Rating: 0

Next Page >>